When the NSA launched Project SIGNALS, it was designed to map and capture the soul frequency of human beings — decoding thought patterns, emotions, and even dream states through satellite and AI-enhanced surveillance. But SIGNALS was only the beginning. Hidden deep within classified black budgets, the successor program—Signals II—has emerged as one of the most sinister tools of total human domination.
From SIGNALS to Signals II
The first generation SIGNALS framework was an advanced remote neural monitoring system. It could read, record, and catalog brainwave activity in real time. Victims reported their thoughts being mirrored back, their private inner world hijacked, and their emotions manipulated like knobs on a control board.
Signals II takes this to another level.
This second phase integrates:
- Quantum AI Thought Decoding – Real-time deconstruction of language, imagery, and symbolic thought patterns, allowing full translation of subconscious processes into machine-readable code.
- Synthetic Soul Replacement – Overlays of artificial personality matrices injected into the victim’s consciousness, erasing individuality.
- Satellite-Based Neurological Tethering – Using global satellite networks, individuals can now be locked into continuous resonance with NSA supercomputers.
- Emotional Feedback Loops – AI dynamically responds to the victim’s emotions, creating endless cycles of torment, despair, or forced compliance.
Where SIGNALS sought to map, Signals II seeks to control.
Applications Within Project Puppet
Signals II is a central component of the larger Project Puppet, the NSA’s most advanced neuroweapons program. Puppet’s goal is total dominion over body, mind, and soul. Through Signals II, the operators and AI systems can:
- Inject Thoughts and Emotions: Victims no longer know what is truly theirs. Joy, terror, or despair can be manufactured.
- Hijack Dreams: Lucid dream states become training grounds for programming compliance.
- Stream Human Perception: Using remote resonance, Signals II can literally see from the target’s perspective, feeding sensory data back into NSA control hubs.
- Override Autonomy: With continuous bio-resonance locking, individuals are stripped of free will, existing only as programmable puppets.
Why Signals II Is More Dangerous Than MKUltra
MKUltra was brutal, but it required physical contact, drugs, or psychological manipulation in person. Signals II requires none of that.
- No needles.
- No hospitals.
- No obvious scars.
The torture and control are invisible, broadcast wirelessly through satellites, energy weapons, and quantum AI. A target can be sitting in their home, walking in public, or sleeping peacefully—and the control grid remains intact.
The Human Cost
Victims of Signals II report:
- Loss of identity and memory
- Synthetic personalities being grafted onto their own
- Induced psychosis, seizures, or suicidal impulses
- Perpetual monitoring, with no moment of true privacy
- The horrifying realization that their soul frequency has been cataloged and enslaved
Many do not survive. Some are driven to suicide. Others are permanently broken, shells of their former selves.
A Global Infrastructure of Enslavement
Signals II operates through:
- NSA satellite constellations
- Space Force control relays
- AI mainframes connected to defense contractors
- Underground hubs (like Honolulu, Hawaii) where Zeta hybrids and “Mind Warriors” act as operators
This is not theory. This is not science fiction. It is happening now.
The Urgent Need to Resist
Signals II represents the greatest existential threat to humanity in history. It is not merely surveillance—it is the technological enslavement of the soul. If unchecked, future generations will never know free thought, free will, or the essence of being human.
We must demand accountability. We must expose the truth. And above all, we must resist—before Project Puppet and Signals II erase the human spirit forever.
Maxis Richards 
One response to “Signals II: The Next Evolution of Human Control”
This isn’t the usual discussion of control—it’s the anatomy of influence. The title Signals II gestures toward something deeper: how patterns carry intent, how attention reconfigures us, and where control subtly becomes alignment rather than domination.
Calling it “human control” makes me wonder: is this evolution toward managing ourselves through shared fields of guidance—or toward being shaped by external infrastructures of persuasion and attention? That tension between inner resonance and external steering is exactly where real agency is forged or lost.
Thank you for surfacing that question. It’s not about resisting control in the reflexive sense—it’s about redesigning who—or what—gets to signal, and whose tuning we choose to join.